Jump to content

Nebulized narcan?


ambodriver

Recommended Posts

Nebulized narcan.

Yes?

No?

Why or why not?

Effective or ineffective?

For someone who is essentially apneic or has agonal respirations, obviously it is pointless. To me, nebulized naloxone is a longer term tx that is used for someone who may be lethargic, and you want to gradually improve his level of consciousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most optimal uptake via neb for most broncho dilators is ~ 10 to 15 % efficacy.

I have nebulized Morphine (bronchogenic carcinoma) but I have never heard of narcan neb.

Why one would deliver narcan this way is beyond me when one can deliver narcan IV/IM/SC/ET.

Maybe something I have never heard of ???

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most optimal uptake via neb for most broncho dilators is ~ 10 to 15 % efficacy.

I have nebulized Morphine (bronchogenic carcinoma) but I have never heard of narcan neb.

Why one would deliver narcan this way is beyond me when one can deliver narcan IV/IM/SC/ET.

Maybe something I have never heard of ???

cheers

Forgive my 'student ignorance' but I've got a question or two here...

You mention Narcan IV/IM/SC/ET. I'm pretty sure that means Intravenous/Intramuscular/Subcutaneous/Endotracheal. Am I right so far?

Next question: If you have to intubate the patient due to airway compromise, doesn't it sesem counter productive to be adding liquid meds to a system that already has problems?

Since drugs like Narcan, MS, and others don't naturally occur in regular atmosphere, wouldn't it be logical to conclude that the lungs would recognize these drugs as 'foreign substances' and try to encapsulate it in mucus in an attempt to get it out of the lungs? This could then add to the pulmonary edema, increasing airway compromise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive my 'student ignorance' but I've got a question or two here...

You mention Narcan IV/IM/SC/ET. I'm pretty sure that means Intravenous/Intramuscular/Subcutaneous/Endotracheal. Am I right so far?

Next question: If you have to intubate the patient due to airway compromise, doesn't it sesem counter productive to be adding liquid meds to a system that already has problems?

Since drugs like Narcan, MS, and others don't naturally occur in regular atmosphere, wouldn't it be logical to conclude that the lungs would recognize these drugs as 'foreign substances'

Split up .. 2 questions here.

and try to encapsulate it in mucus in an attempt to get it out of the lungs? This could then add to the pulmonary edema, increasing airway compromise.

cheers I hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you send me your protocol on nebulized MS, even for the reason displayed?

Sorry but no protocols for this in ICU or oncology besides not that many standing orders or protocols for RRTs in the ICU/ Floors as primaraly we work from the MDs written orders or verbal, then the RRT enters those in the orders, we are permitted to do this, MS as per neb would be stretching those limits big time.

That said" Orders can vary dependent on the most recent study that they, the Inensivist has just read and / or individual fellow / resident writing those orders.

I have not nebulized M/S in EMS field.

cheers

Edited by tniuqs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...