There is a huge differential on any woman who is old enough to have children (on the young ones too but some stuff can be safely ruled out). I don't know much about NZ prehospital care but in the USA what exactly is going on with the gal is not really a field medics job.
Even an MD in the field without labs, ultrasound, X-ray, and limited in the scope of their exam, i.e. no pelvic/bimanual exam is going to go... hmmm. febrile, hypercapnic, dysuria.... could be this, or that, or whatever....
So in the USA we would transport to her hospital of choice where she would be worked up, figured out, and treated. If the doc/nurse/whatever asked what we thought was wrong the answer is going to be along the lines of what 1C gave as a hand off.
Does she have an ectopic?? She denies...but patients have been known to lie, does she have a hot appy?? who knows, UTI?? who knows... thats what the hospital does NOT what the medics in the field do. Recognizing that the gal is sick and needs to be seen is the gold standard along with symptomatic treatment PRN.
Once she hits the ED then the work up will point us to where we need to be. In your system you may do things differently so please rather then spank "us" for not trying to over think a patient*, tell how you guys would "pin point" her pathology in the field in the back of your ambulance.
* Please don't take this as being anti-knowledge for EMS people but we have to recognize that difinitive differential diagnosis of complex medical problems is the job for the ED/Clinic etc. Having a good knowledge base is great and EMS eduction in the USA is lacking in many ways but I would rather have a medic in the field that says... "I don't know wtf is going on here, but this gal needs to go to the hospital." then one who says "Ooh damn this gal has hysterosalpigingiooophoritis and needs to see her PMD on Monday.." and be wrong!
Cheer!
Pave