Jump to content

Suffocation and C-spine precautions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, I think it's a Canadian thing . . . (or at least not something I've heard in California).

My post was mainly poking fun at BEorP (and Canadians in general....the theme of the trip) who had to explain the term to me at the Cadaver lab last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my responce is this.

If he had a Fx in the lwr cervicle spine do you want to be the one responcible for severing the spine and ensuring he never breaths under his own power again?

SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION IS NOT LIFE OVER LIMB, IT IS LIFE OR DEATH

This is one of those pieces of EMS dogma that gets passed down with this kind of emphatic dedication with absolutely no evidence to back it up. Not one reported case, EVER, of a patient having neurological deficit from improper c-spine precautions. And cases like this one are exactly why it is important for EMS providers to know what the real risks are, since management of the airway may be at odds with protection of the c-spine.

And a LOW c-spine fracture will not cause paralysis of the diaphragm unless there is substantial cord contusion at levels above the fracture. Dust, Anthony, BEorP, JakeEMTP, akroeze, and CBEMT can tell you this after the cadaver lab. :D

'zilla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So seriously what are the chances that we'll see LSB and collars disappear under evidence based practice? I can't see how they could do a study on something like this that would pass an ethics board.

Unless... do wounded soldiers under fire get collared and boarded? Could that lead to research on immobilization for penetrating trauma?

Also physiologically speaking, what's different about splinting an extremity and splinting a spine that makes splinting the extremity a good idea and the spine an idea based on dubious science?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think it's a Canadian thing . . . (or at least not something I've heard in California).

My post was mainly poking fun at BEorP (and Canadians in general....the theme of the trip) who had to explain the term to me at the Cadaver lab last week.

I also had to inform Anthony that snow is not just a Canadian thing (first I had to show him a map to explain that there are states other than California). But yes, Matt, VSA is a Canadian term it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So seriously what are the chances that we'll see LSB and collars disappear under evidence based practice? I can't see how they could do a study on something like this that would pass an ethics board.

Unless... do wounded soldiers under fire get collared and boarded? Could that lead to research on immobilization for penetrating trauma?

Also physiologically speaking, what's different about splinting an extremity and splinting a spine that makes splinting the extremity a good idea and the spine an idea based on dubious science?

http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/colu...ms_studies.html

Study number 1 comes as an example.

As far as the second part, you don't splint an extremity just because the person had a traumatic event like you do the spine. We splint limbs when we have reasons to believe it's fractured. We splint spines unless we are certain it's not fractured (e.g. the absence of a traumatic event).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, of course, in the case of a bone, we are attempting to maintain rigidity on something that is normally rigid. The spine is not normally rigid. We are, therefore, attempting to induce an unnatural state, contrary to the very principle of homeostasis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good point. I hadn't considered that for some reason.

Okay back to Doczilla on this one. So that I'm clear, the lack of instances of neurological damage due to improper C-spine immobilization is just for when they've been immobilized but it sucked or was done late or missed etc. This isn't saying that there isn't a possibility of secondary injury resulting in neurological damage after the initial spinal insult?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...