Jump to content

City to be more selective in dispatching ambulances


CBEMT

Recommended Posts

Lomi Kriel - Express-News

Of 18,179 traffic accidents in that time period, only 25 percent required hospitalization, and of 1,677 medical alert alarms, fewer than 13 percent.

Of 18,179 accidents up to 4500 patients sustained injuries serious enough to require being addmitted to the hospital.

With these numbers, it is clear to the ambulance management that we must send at least 1 ALS unit to EVERY accident scene, no matter how minor it may seem.

There now the argument is made the other way, using the same info :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of 18,179 accidents up to 4500 patients sustained injuries serious enough to require being addmitted to the hospital.

With these numbers, it is clear to the ambulance management that we must send at least 1 ALS unit to EVERY accident scene, no matter how minor it may seem.

There now the argument is made the other way, using the same info :lol:

Exactly. Using the same figures as the Chief, 218 out of 1677 medical alarms required the patient to be admitted to hospital.

I don't know, but that sounds as if an ALS ambulance should be dispatched to every call. Wait, let's dispatch a engine, with a medic, then call for an ambulance because the pt. actually does require a trip to the hospital. That sounds much better :roll: ](*,). Delaying definitive pt. care is not the answer. EMS is not about making money especially for a City run service. IT IS ABOUT THE PATIENT! Cancel the order for the new engine (with grant money I'm sure) and purchase 5 ambulances. That is being more fiscally responsible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. Using the same figures as the Chief, 218 out of 1677 medical alarms required the patient to be admitted to hospital.

I don't know, but that sounds as if an ALS ambulance should be dispatched to every call. Wait, let's dispatch a engine, with a medic, then call for an ambulance because the pt. actually does require a trip to the hospital. That sounds much better :roll: ](*,). Delaying definitive pt. care is not the answer. EMS is not about making money especially for a City run service. IT IS ABOUT THE PATIENT! Cancel the order for the new engine (with grant money I'm sure) and purchase 5 ambulances. That is being more fiscally responsible.

But that huge red fire truck is prettier than the ambulances. It's all about visibility people, visibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...