P_Instructor

WOW. First, I cannot believe that this instructor is so ignorant to the fact your research into the definitions is wrong. Any instructor that's worth their salt should percieve this as 'feedback'. Question that I have, is the National Registry still going to test this level or drop it before your class is completed? Who knows, as this process has been ongoing for some time now. The main thing that the instructor should be following in the standard curriculum and teaching from that, using the book as a supplement. You, confronting the instructor with supporting evidence should taken as a very caring and passionate response to what your goal is, to obtain this level of certification. You want to learn, but you want to learn the right information. I will wait for further responses to add to this topic's subject matter. You follow the course objectives, and if problems continue, it is your prerogative to take it to the next level, ie. the medical director for the course (as every EMS class should have a medical direction through the training facility).

HHHHHHHaaaaaaaa.....snicker,snicker......I'll give you a 9 on the 1-10 scale for that one! Ya slammed me!

Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, penalty for driving while texting.....cut his fingers off.......stupidity is right!

I would like to thank all of you for the lively responses concerning this topic. It will be interesting to see the outcome of the changes, although maybe not for a few years. Thanks again!

OK you bashers from my other topic. Does anyone know if this is a degree or diploma program, accredited or non institution, and lookee see.....involved the FFer's and non mentioned other participants......hummmmm.

Holy buckets, Batman, the bucket is overflowing with responses. Alright, this intro just to lighten the discussion a bit. I greatly appreciate the viewing (over 1000) and the responses to the topic I brought forth. I knew that this would have great debate, and all responses whether positive or negative were followed by me. For members who have viewed and not responded, please do so. Your input would be greatly appreciated. This from a practicing provider and also an instructor (for an accredited and degree program). Thanks!

Just watching it makes me dogged tired........rather do something else...

All I can say is WOOF! Then I get it's B-arf!

Whoa pardner.....Since I originated this post concerning the different levels and new standards, I was very interested in other opinions. Concerning this statement you made above, just what 'issue' do you have? I am from Iowa, was an 85-I, then took the paramedic course a long time ago and saw the progression of the 99I. Do not pen the phrase 'for lack of paramedics'. There were many other factors why Iowa provided this level, and the term 'Iowa Paramedic' for the 99I was because of the specific topics taught within this curriculum aligned with Iowa's scope of practice. Did I completely agree with this.....no.....but there are numerous other items to consider. This has created a nightmare for some of these individuals currently at the 99I or 85I level on whether to move up or down to the forecasted EMT, AEMT, or Paramedic level. It's a dilema that this post was originally started to see how others within the nation felt about the changes.

aah, who knows. Imagine having a 'J' tank of this loaded on your ambulance....?????

Interesting concept for 'not killing' but 'killing' certain diseases. http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/10/09/cheating.death.suspended.animation/index.html?eref=rss_topstories I bet all you RT's are going.......WHAT?????

Thank you. As an instructor of a tech college, it is my job to provide guidance to the student so they can fully comprehend what being a paramedic is, all facets......It IS what the student makes of it. If they know their 'worth', and are willing to learn, they will do fine. If an instructor cannot do their job, the student will suffer and the public will suffer, maybe......the key as you stated is judge them on their merits, but be careful moving on to figuring out who is to blame, as this will most likely be the student themselves. Thanks for the 'vent'.

Welcome and good luck. Which Medic program are you attending?

Thank you for the 'discussion' whether it be a little personal or not. I have come to realize that each state will have to adopt the standards that will meet there regional requirements. This may very difficult for some states to adhere to. In my opinion (as of now), the process is to clean up the current mess that is out there. If everyone can get to a standardized format, the EMS nation as a whole may progress forward, however this will take time and a lot of effort. It is about time to bring everyone back in line and not let states go rampant with what they want personnally. Again, my opinion only and looking forward how this hopefully will improve even better the EMS field response.

Usually inappropriate for scene response. My opinion is that aeromedical (which is typically a money loser except for being a flying billboard) should not be utilized within a 20-30 minute scene from trauma facility. Only under extreme circumstances should it be utilized as stated in prior post (multiple patient, prolong extrication, etc.). This being said because dependant of region, request to liftoff time usually between 8-12 minutes where you still have land/scene/stabilize/package/load/transport/land time which most commonly computes to longer out of hospital time than ground transport. If the ground transport will take longer, then utilize, but it also may be dependant on patient condition (ex. fly a broken ankle????) Every situation will have different perception on utilizing the aero resource.

Ok, just got back from heated discussion/meeting concerning the new national standards and EMS level criteria. Now, what is your true opinion concerning the new levels. For, Ok, whatever, what?, or just WTF. Give me your honest opinion, even if you are one of the potential transitional providers (85I, 99I). I would greatly appreciate your response with possible debate. Thanks.

From a Paramedic with Czech and Polish heritage: Witamy w witrynie. Hope usłyszeć od można w przyszłości. (Yes I cheated and had to look this up.....)

Criteria or not, if you suspect the potential for a thoracic spinal injury, immobilize. You cannot completely rule out a fracture even with the best criteria against it. Without a patient refusal, board the gourd and transport.

At least Johnny made it plausible starting his own IV, etc. in 'Emergency'.....oh yeah, that was on the hose bed of E51 running hot to Rampart. Still was better than the crap they do on this show.

It does depend on which kind you obtain. Basically what sort of gap do you have, and how can you secured your patient best to them. Most of the new ones are good, but that is from someone who is used to the old lightening rods.

Will do....thanks.

I think I'm going to have to dust mine off and get back to using it again.....you and Kiwi are right..