Hi Craig,
If you review the 3 Australian documents:
1. Towards the Prevention of SCI - Menzies Technical Report (put out by the Australian Spinal Units including the RNS Spinal Unit)
2. Victorian Ministerial Task Force: Review Of Trauma And Emergency Services - Victorian Department Of Health Services
3. The Management Of Acute Neurotrauma In Remote And Rural Areas - Royal Australiasian College of Surgeons
you will find that there is significant support in each of these documents for the immobilisation of patients to the Long Spine Board with a semi rigid collar. NSW and Victoria have already introduced protocols based on the findings and recommendations of these documents. Other states in Australia are relooking at their protocols based on recent documents. The limit of 30 minutes on a Board in NSW is based on USA studies undertaken on unpadded and flat Long Spine Boards. These studies do not reflect what we do (or should do), that is padded and curved Boards.
You are correct that a poorly padded flat Long Board does cause misalignment and discomfort, and should be a message to all, not to perform a poor standard of Long Board application or complications will result. For comfort issues and a study reviewing the padded curved board, have a look at the study on the website http://www.neann.com/Board%20Comfort.htm and you will see very clearly that a well padded curved Long Board provides good comfort for at least 1 hour, and that it is actually the C-Collar that is the problem.
Your idea of putting a patient on the stretcher mattress and immobilising the head to it, probably needs to be rethought. What you are doing here is immobilising the head, and so the neck becomes the pivoting point for all body rotatioin, the very thing that is trying to be avoided. The stretcher straps are not adequate to secure the patient's torso and pelvis to the stretcher to then allow immobilisation of the head. DHS (the manufacturer of the ASNSW stretcher) will not guarantee the safety of the spinal patient using this method with their stretcher. In fact no study anywhere supports this as an acceptable standard of care and nor do the 3 above Australian documents.
I do accept that sometimes the patient will not accept immobilisation to a Long Board, and that the NIEJ or other form of Extrication Jacket may be an alternative, or maybe only a C Collar can be applied. And I think this would be supported in any court. However the NIEJ, nor any other jacket, is not a replacement for the Long Board unless the above or some other exceptional reasoning, and it is clearly not the teaching to the ASNSW. Studies looking at immobilisation with a jacket whilst showing excellent C-spine immobilisation, show far less immobilisation to the rest of the spine. Considering that some 48% of SCI in Australia is below the C-spine (AIHW statistics 2003-2004), the jacket clearly based on research is not adequate on it's own.
Finally, for those who want an extremely detailed freely downloadable manual on all aspects of prehospital spinal care, go to http://www.neann.com/lsbmanual.pdf.
Best wishes
Anthony
MICA Paramedic