WOW... a great topic, but one that parallels those other ones with the pitfalls of discussing politics or religion. You just cant get all to agree.
I would like to offer my opinion... given my nearly 30 years of EMS experience that includes volunteer, paid, EMT, Paramedic, Instructor, hospital based, helicopter, chiefs etc etc. I have developed a bit of an opinion like most other type "A's in the business....
As an industry and/or profession we have come a long way... but clearly not far enough. Much like other "professions" such as nursing, we have had rocky start due to being poorly organized, poorly led (at the state and federal levels), poorly educated (going back to the poorly organized), and often poorly funded.
We have a range of "providers" that go from the guy (or gal) who has a 24 hour first-aid and CPR card set that just drive to the very experienced and over-educated Flight Nurse/Paramedic/PHD/etc. We have volunteers that provide service up to 100 hours a week to highly paid FT professionals that work 40 and no more!
I realize that I am preaching to choir and stating the obvious, but without setting the stage i would not be able to use it all in my opinion.
First and foremost, it is not work arguing when it comes to the battle between whether or not we should have volunteers. It is a loosing battle to try to just have paid professionals. That does not mean we should not have standards that are close those that paid persons often have to meet.
The second and a very serious one is the fact that EMS personnel must understand where they stand in their own shop before they try to compare themselves or get parity with nurses etc. EMTs with 120 hours of education must stop asking for equal pay to a nurse, police officer, or FT Fire Fighter. Paramedics must follow that lead as well.
EMS as an industry should develop its own pay scales and industry standards. One simply cannot compare 120 hours of class to 4000 hours of class not to mention the differences in competencies and responsibilities. Yes,,, we can all start IVs better that any nurse (or at least most) and most paramedics can out intubate the average ED doc. That does not change the fact that we have different chosen roles and responsibilities and educational requirements.
With all that said, where do we need to go and what do we need to do to push EMS a little farther forward...
A two side approach -
Lessen the negativity (as mentioned above) and increased self regulation with clearly defined missions, educational requirements, and standardized certifications or licensing.
A national approach that addresses the clear issue of uniting EMS into an industry standard. To date, the only industry standard to emerge is that people need some form of oxygen and eventual transport to the hospital.
We must stop EMTs from thinking they are paramedics or nurses and we must stop paramedics from thinking they are nurses or physicians. We are who we are and we must accept it. We must accept the fact that EMS as a whole cannot gain professional status across the board until there is an educational requirement. And yes... we may have to suffer the pain of knowing that the minimum may be a BA/BS for a paramedic who wants to "practice". We must accept that there will be areas that are served by volunteers. Though I do agree that we should not EVER lessen our standards just because they dont get paid.... after all it was their choice.
I apologize to anyone I may have offended... that is definately not my intent. This topic will be a hot one for many many years.