Sadly the answer is no as the problems with Zoll monitors seems to plague the entire family. Our service uses the CCT, the m-series and is trying out the e-series. My recommendation would be to try anything else.
I have made numerous posts about Zoll monitors, on a variety of forums, to the point now that I feel like an anti-Zoll zealot, but I do feel strongly about this: Look for something else.
I am not a gear-head type of guy I just want equipment that works and I could care less about the name on the monitor, but when equipment starts impacting on your care it is time to try something else.
For example, people say the NIBP is slow and inaccurate, and I would agree and to take it a step further I would say you would be hard pressed to get a reading on anyone under 100 systolic. Picture being stuck in a plane, wondering if your art line is accurate, trying to confirm it with a NIBP but guess what? You can’t get one so you go with the art line reading of 98/60, then you notice ‘phantom’ pacing spikes but you know the patient does not have a pacemaker so now the monitor is counting those as complexes so the rate on the monitor is faster than it should be, all the while your SpO2 sensor is beeping all the time because the cable is coming apart where it hooks into the monitor.
What else? Battery life can be an issue. Oh and they are heavy and expensive.