-first the priest: you only gave me the information you did, because that was all that you were given. So, like you or someone else stated in another post, the other information was taken form sterotyping. so be that said, and this applies to the stereotpying of the other members as well.
the priest I stereotyped based on my stereotypical priest. a priest is only a priest. the group is too small in my opinion to warrent spiritial guidence.
-the protistute is again stereotyped as I stated previously. female under 30. i did not make the assumption that being a prostitute as being a bad thing. actually, I see the profession as an occupation as well as service.
-the lawyer is based on personal bias, my major dislike of lawyers. I stereotyped this lawyer as a trial lawyer. those i like even less. why this is so, is Not a discussion for debate. and no, i dont have a "Record". i just have a general dislike for lawyers.
-now for the pregnant child, as you put it. first and formost, I am not going to debate when a fetus is a living human being. my definition is very specific; and I will not state those specifications here. Lets just say: I am Pro Choice. And I stand firm on the liability of the pregnant child to the survival of the group. what those 7 people will encounter, are horrors and devistation beyound the average person comprehention. they will need all of the members to be as functional and productive as possible.
-regarding the police officer; he/she could be just as bad or worse than the lawyer. so who knows.
and as far as the other things that you stated previously in this post: those are probably your stereotypes, assumptions, and "what-if?" information.
this sociology exam can be "what-if'ed to death.
I based my response to your initial question/situation, based on my knowledge, beliefs, stereotypes, perosonal bias, and my military training
All in all I enjoy these types of questions. it lets me see me from a different perspective.