AS An EMSA employee I am trying to come up with what I think would be the best system for OKC and Tulsa Areas I would like some input in what works best and what doesnt.
First things First I would get rid of SSM it doesnt work sitting in a truck for 12 hours in sometimes the most dangerous parts of town doesnt get us to any emergency any faster than a station. We do have two 24hr stations at EMSA west in Yukon and Mustang, and my response times dont differ. So finding stations would be the #1 priorty, IE (hospitals, Fire stations). A recent study that the ocfd did showed 29 of its 34 stations have room for ambulances.
Shifts- I would put 24 hr trucks in the outer slower parts of the area and 12 hour trucks in the busy areas. So you would work one 24 hr shift a week and two 12 hr shifts this would help in Burnout, and be able to put more ambulances in to service as of right now in the west we have anywhere between 12 to 20 trucks in service at a time and that is to cover OKC, Yukon, MUSTANG, EDMOND,Bethany THE Village, Nichols Hills, Warr accers, All paid FD plus vollie FD like DEER Creek, Piedmont, Richland. ADD all that up there has to be aleast 45 engines staffed with 4 people. With each Depts run volume being 80 % medical why have more engines than ambulances I dont know the math doesnt add up. So with that being said I think there should always be aleast 30 trucks covering the area 15 being 24 HR and 15 being 12 HR that would be a total of 45 people working on the ambulance a day.
Next would be response there is no getting around it fire will be apart of are response. I think OCFD and mustang do a very good job with EMS calls. And I enjoy running calls with them. But I dont see a need in sending a big fire engine to a BS call. Mustang has a rescue that is equipped with not only medical equipment but they have rescue and SCBA and there bunker gear on board it seats two people and is on a F450 frame. They staff it with one ONE PMED and one Basic. The system works great. Out of all the FDs we run with this one works the best. So I would think it would be cheeper to in long run for depts like OCFD two have about 25 of these in different stations. Houston has FLY cars like these and it seems to work really well there.
THe other part of response would have alot to do with dispatch. When the call is taken dispatch should as fast as they can put it in a response catagorery. For example
Code 1- Full arrest, Trama, CVA, ETC would get fires fly car going lights and sirens, and an Ambulance going lights and sirens.
Code 2 - SOB, Chest pain, etc would have FD Fly car running lights and sirens and ambulance started that way non lights and sirens. IF FD gets on scene and determines that it is life threating radio the ambulance and tell them to step it up
Code 3 - Ambulance only response lights and sirens fall, broken bones,
Code 4 Ambulance only non lights and sirens Toe pain, Bum who just wants a ride, ETC From What I understand Starting in 2010 We will be able to deny transport to non life threating calls for Service.
This Step All depends on how well dispatch gets Info from the call taker
Another Idea I had was putting BLS ambulance in the mix somewhere maybe for the code 4 response
The thing Iam having the most problem with is funding should EMSA stay PUM or go under the city somehow. I know we deserve the same pay as nurses and the same pension as firefighers. I could see how going under fire would help there and I think they would cross train the people who would want to do fire and let the people who just wanted to work the ambulance work the ambulance
I know OCFD will really be pushing for it in the next couple of years. IF SB357 passes this spring they will have a better shot of taking over service from smaller depts like bethany, Village, Mustang Etc
Anyways this is just a rough draft any input would be helpful.