Jump to content

matt202

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by matt202

  1. my company prohibits us from carrying any weapons, there stand point is were there to save lives not take them.

    IMHO you are of no use to anyone if you are in there and dead because you cannot protect yourself. Please tell me what is the difference between somebody else taking a life to protect you, rather than you doing the same?

    • Like 1
  2. Anecdotal accounts are one thing but is there any hard evidence around the time taken from injury to the time the time EMS gets hands on the patient during swat team deployments? Furthermore is there any evidence in relation to unarmed tactical medics moving forward to manage casualties while the swat team is still dealing with the threat? My reasons for asking are that in my experience in the UK if you are not in there as part of the team you don't get in there until it is safe. This is due to a variety of reasons and i'm asking so as to learn from your experiences to improve our system.

    Regards

    Matt

  3. Would really like your views on the above. In the UK tactical medicine is in it's infancy. I am aware that there are many variations in relation to the topic in the US. Are there any of you out there that are providing support to swat teams, working in the hot zone (where bullets are flying) doing it unarmed? If so, has this ever been tested? Where I work my bosses would not let EMS into the scene until it was safe. As a police officer and paramedic I would really appreciate your experiences.

  4. I agree fully. I think you misunderstood me. The role of the team medic is about the team and everything that relates to the team and the deployment but that is just the first link in the chain. The next bit is about having the appropriate EMS response ready to receive the patient. That may be an ambulance around the next block, but it may also include a doc and one, two or more ambulances or helicopters for that matter with docs on board at appropriate landing sites close to the incident. It depends on the job and the medical threat assessment that relates to that job.

  5. Now I know I'm not going to be popular with this response, but in the UK there have been two incidents of this type in the last 25 years. Michael Ryan in Hungerford and Thomas Hamilton in Dunblain. The UK government banned handguns and made it very difficult to obtain any other type of firearm legally. Since then there have been no other incidents of this type. I think that in the US you have to accept that if you make firearms available to the general public, eventually, this type of scenario will occur.

  6. "If you have the manpower." Big question, especially when you may well be one, two or more down as a result of the firefight. If the medic is armed they can operate as part of the team, within the team. Giving them a gun means they are at the sharp end, not at the last point of cover and concealment. Under these circumstances I do think that an armed medic will get to the patient quicker as they are closer and may not need escort. As to getting the patient to definitive care, it's difficult to generalise on the wide variety of scenarios you may be faced with, but remember that any rescue needs planning and the best plan may be to hold off on the rescue and deal with the bad guy. It may well be that you are stuck with your patient. Aggressive early intervention may be all they require at this stage. If you are there you can make assessment/treatment decisions regarding your patient and if you are lucky provide definitive care. Dragging them back through the team may not be necessary. Safest thing may be to just hold in cover, communicate what you've got and let the team deal. Big thing for me is that the medic needs to be within the team. If you are at the sharp end, everyone within the team should be able to protect themselves.

  7. I agree with your comments with regard to trauma being the focus when it comes to kit. I was just interested to know the drugs you consider to be essentials on entry. Over here we keep general stuff in the packs at the door and just have a leg bag with trauma kit, LMA, some analgesic, sedation and narcan.

  8. The way we do it over here is to select previously trained nurses/para's/military medics who have joined the police service and then train them as team medics and that includes all the firearms training. Each team member must also have completed basic trauma course. This provides close quarter medical support with a conventional response from the EMS services at the last point of cover and concealment.

    In the UK it is against the law for non-police officers to carry weapons, that's why we train the police as medics.

    regards

    Matt

  9. As I have said before TEMS is a fairly new concept in the UK, so I was trained as a team member before qualifying as a Paramedic. Bottom line is that if you are the only medic on the team you will be in a support role but still part of the entry team. If there is more than one medic on the team you are aloud to get to the sharp end.

×
×
  • Create New...