Jump to content

Airway


Violyn

Recommended Posts

Has anyone used the i-gel airway? It seems like a much easier option than King or others. No inflatable cuff, less tissue trauma, less chance of aspiration, easy insertion.........

post-66898-0-24724400-1426009840_thumb.j

Thoughts? Experiences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like an LMA. I just read two quick abstracts (and briefly read through the studies) comparing the i-gel to two different models of LMAs. One study was pro i-gel. The other was pro LMA. Having never used this device, however, I can't comment on it.

As far as backup airways go I'm not a fan of the LMA in field use. I do like the King tubes. Even Combitubes are ok. (If given the choice between the two I'll take the King.) Given the way things are going it looks like these things may not be the backup airway options for much longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We carry them as our backup airway; had to use it a couple times, either as a bridge to intubation or until arrival at the ER.

No major complaints; it can be slightly touchy to get a adequate seal, but that's probably due to using the wrong size and an easy enough fix. Stability...meh. Do a good job securing it and it's ok...and if there is a little forward/backward play in it it shouldn't be a major problem as it will (or should anyway) reseat itself each time. Not an excuse to not tape in properly though.

Anesthesiologists seem to love them, though the environments are different. Personally I think it's fine to use as a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 months later...
On 3/10/2015 at 11:18 AM, paramedicmike said:

I do like the King tubes. Even Combitubes are ok. (If given the choice between the two I'll take the King.)

 

I'm much the fan of King airways over Combitubes as well. If I'm the only medic on a code, I would rather slip the King in & use that as my airway so that I can concentrate on other measures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just throwing this out there. Most services with high ROSC rates still use a plain old ET tube. Seattle and BCAS (within Metro Vancouver) come to mind. They also try to maintain a paired, tiered, and targeted ALS response within metro zones.

Overall skill retention/proficiency haven't been shown their due over the years and it shows. Don't get me wrong, the King is a great back up airway, but it feels like their is an appetite to solve the problem with toys instead of what's really missing; education.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, rock_shoes said:

Just throwing this out there. Most services with high ROSC rates still use a plain old ET tube. Seattle and BCAS (within Metro Vancouver) come to mind. They also try to maintain a paired, tiered, and targeted ALS response within metro zones.

Overall skill retention/proficiency haven't been shown their due over the years and it shows. Don't get me wrong, the King is a great back up airway, but it feels like their is an appetite to solve the problem with toys instead of what's really missing; education.

Also at issue are high stakes, high skills burden procedures. For real proficiency in procedures like advanced airway security, there is just no substitute for doing it a lot. Just how that happens is another question.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...