PRPGfirerescuetech Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 What is everyones thoughts and preferences on this? Would you prefer a medic with a more Scientific background? (Edited as appropriate) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trackmedic Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I would like to just be recognized something more than "The Ambulance Driver" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustdevil Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Can you clarify the two choices for me? Are you referring to their pre-professional background, or the content of their EMS education? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridryder 911 Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Really, this can misleading. One of medicine is from science and art. Vocation can interpreted as hands on training without knowing or understanding the rationale why you perform tasks. For education purposes, until we remove it from the vocation training we will never be respected or receive the pay we should get. In comparison the Paramedic would be equivalent to an LPN or LVN... Be safe, Ridryder 911 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustdevil Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I'm still not exactly certain what you're saying. But yes, I believe the minimal entry level education for EMS should be collegiate and include a much stronger scientific foundation. But then again, I have to say that it should also include a lot more vocational (read: clinical) education than it currently does too. Regarding the poll, neither choice works for me, as there is no "always" rule which applies to individual medics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRPGfirerescuetech Posted September 5, 2005 Author Share Posted September 5, 2005 What is everyones thoughts and preferences on this? Would you prefer a medic with a more Scientific background from a educational perspective? (Edited as appropriate) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Summit Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 I too found the question confusing it seemed to ask whether science OR field experience was preferable. So is the question actually simply whether science is a good thing to teach EMS providers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRPGfirerescuetech Posted September 5, 2005 Author Share Posted September 5, 2005 Yes....my apologies. TO ALL. Should general science programs be added to the EMS programs, such as biology, chemestry, micro-biology...etc... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 If that is the case, then yes, I agree that science should be added to the course of study. Biology, A & P and chemistry. This does not however replace vocational study. Knowing about the above mentioned courses is all well and good, but knowing how to use this knowledge is just as critical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asysin2leads Posted September 6, 2005 Share Posted September 6, 2005 Quite frankly, its hard to have the understanding of physiology and pathophysiology needed to be a good medic if you don't have university level chemistry I&II and biology I&II under your belt. Plus you sound smart too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.