This is an actual patient/scenario of mine. It happened in a Non American country, though in an environment where the moral/ethical/legal rights of the patient and responders are pretty much the same.
Going into this I'd ask us to proceed accepting a couple of assumptions as fact, in the spirit of the intended question. The first that I am at least minimally competent in assessing a traumatic patient, to include an accurate assessment of mentation. The second, that I'm at least minimally competent where getting difficult patients to bend to my will is concerned. In other words, even if you don't believe me competent in those areas, please don't take the easy way out, ("You couldn't do it, but I could have.") in this discussion. See what I mean?
You're dispatched by the comms shack to a 'man with a hurt leg."
Upon arrival you are pointed to a man sitting on a stack of pallets, he's calm, smoking a cigarette, and in good humor. He answers questions quickly, clearly and appropriately. He is aware of all that is going on in his environment, his balance as he sits there is confident. If you could see him from the knees above only there would be no sign that he has any issues at all from your initial impression.
Below the knees however you notice that his left lower leg is being held in place by a 2" diam piece of of lateral skin, the distal lower leg swinging freely. Evidently he's the driver of a truck that's come to pick up some rolls of steel cable. While directing the forklift one of the forks traps his lower leg between it and the palet, effectively amputating the lower limb. The injury is approx. 20 minutes old at this time, bleeding seems to have been limited by the fact that the leg was separated with a crush more than a clean cut, there is very little active bleeding at this time. Sandy/gravel conditions make it impossible to estimate blood loss. Pt rates his pain at 3/10 while looking at his leg and swinging it in little circles as he smokes his cigarette. His only real concern is whether or not it's care will queer the vacation plans that his wife has worked on for two years, set to commence in the next two weeks.
While my partner goes for the cot (trolly, gouney, etc) I lay the patient down, got a good set of vitals, packed the stump with gauze, lined up the lower limb, smashed it into the proximal packing, and tried to hold it all together with a SAM splint and elastic bandages.
When the patient sees the cot coming he immediately says, "I'm not going with you! My wife will be here in a couple of hours, I'll have her take me to the hospital. I'm not going with you, and we both know that you can't make me."
SPO2 99% r/a (sea level plus smoking)
L/S full all fields with only the expected dispersed light wheezing common in chronic smokers.
Described injury the only discovered or reported. Hands/knees/elbows atraumatic.
No n/v, dizziness, drugs/alcohos reported nor suspected.
Unfortunately I've cared for the wound in a rudimentary fashion before the discussion of transport becomes an issue and the patient is convinced that it is more than satisfactory to keep him well until his wife can transport.
I use every argument I can think of up to and including loss of limb and death, even my tried and true, "if you have anyone that you love, or loves you...anyone that depends on you to be a man, then you have no right to act in such a foolish way!" but none so much as makes a tickle in his resolve to wait for his wife. I call his wife, she's two hours out, explain to her that I need to take him now, she talks to him for 5-10 mins, but he won't budge.
I've never really been exposed to such a patient before. I'm comfortable making the argument that he was mentating clearly despite being nearly uneffected by the severity of his wound. Those that have worked around the old time farmers or cowboys can maybe picture this patient...You'll just have to take my word for the fact that you can not legally make the argument later that you took him against his will due to an altered mental status. (You can probably make that argument later and succeed with a CYA tactic, but you can't truthfully make this argument and pretend to stay moral and ethical.)
What do you do? Do you fill out your refusal and leave him? Can you justify this in your service later? If you choose to force him into the ambulance, what legal powers do you use to justify this? What are your moral and ethical responsibilities here?
I look forward to your thoughts...