Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Did you know it is free to become a member?  Just click "Create Account" on the top right of this page.


Photo

Helicopter EMS- Con


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Richard B the EMT

Richard B the EMT
  • Elite Members
  • 6,742 posts
272
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belle Harbor, NY, USA
  • Occupation:Retired EMT-B from the FDNY EMS Command on October 5, 2010, active, overall, as an EMT from 1973 to...



Posted 25 May 2012 - 04:16 PM

At a recent public hearing concerning the closing of a hospital serving an isolated area, one of the commentators yelling at the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health suggested Helicopter EMS be expanded. I was unable to speak with that individual privately, following the hearing.
We in EMT City are also a vocal bunch. This is one of 2 parallel strings on HEMS, this one for Con on the topic, the other will be for Pro.
Comment away, folks!

Edited by Richard B the EMT, 25 May 2012 - 04:25 PM.


#2 Bieber

Bieber
  • Elite Members
  • 836 posts
172
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Midwest
  • Occupation:AAS, Paramedic

Posted 25 May 2012 - 06:41 PM

Where's the evidence of benefit for the majority of patients transported by air?

#3 cscboulder11

cscboulder11
  • Members
  • 125 posts
17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado
  • Interests:EMS, engineering, aviation
  • Occupation:Driver

Posted 25 May 2012 - 08:11 PM

-Can take a while to get the heli out to pts
-Limited by weather
-Limited by range
-Needs a LZ, which takes time to find and clear a suitable one
-Not always faster than ground transport

#4 Captain ToHellWithItAll

Captain ToHellWithItAll

    Chief in charge of my making my family happy Officer

  • Chat Room Moderator
  • 7,244 posts
248
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere over the rainbow
  • Occupation:Paramedic/Emergency Department IT consultant

Posted 25 May 2012 - 08:55 PM

Often are overutilized by crews

Often are used as crutches for conditions that might not warrant air ambulance transports

#5 scott33

scott33
  • Members
  • 577 posts
20
  • Gender:Male
  • Occupation:Ambulance Driver

Posted 26 May 2012 - 01:23 AM

Activation of HEMS by people who are little more than first aiders. Lots of examples of them being used (in populated areas) for simple extremity fractures.

#6 Chief1C

Chief1C

    Look, my ass glows!

  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 3,548 posts
329
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk Jct.
  • Occupation:Offically a Burned Out EMS Provider

Posted 28 May 2012 - 03:52 AM

...for a rural provider, I've treated a good number of people over the years. Some really personal calls, some that stained my mind for life. I rarely use a chopper, but there are some folks that are walking among us today, because I chose that method of transport. I'm a sore loser, when ppl die for lack of time, I second guess myself to death. One patient, died because people overuse helicopters. Used to be, hell you could call one for a broken toe, and you'd get one. Too many people called for broken toes - well, you know what I mean. They changed the protocols, so one has to call HEMS Medical Command, before a flight is granted, for everything except a trauma.

STEMI's, CVA's, stuff that requires immediate special center care.. I don't have a choice, because I can't safely get to one in time to make a difference. One MI, I couldn't call Medical Command. No cell service, no VHF radio service. Dispatch passed the info I had along, and the HEMS Med Command wouldn't hear it. My request was denied. My patient died enroute, 25min after my request was denied.

Edited by 1 C, 28 May 2012 - 03:54 AM.


#7 mikeymedic1984

mikeymedic1984
  • Members
  • 140 posts
21
  • Occupation:Manager

Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:39 AM

Since flightmedic is the most dangerous job in America, I cannot recommend subjecting patients to this danger on a regular basis

#8 Kiwiology

Kiwiology
  • Elite Members
  • 3,241 posts
192
  • Gender:Male
  • Occupation:.

Posted 28 May 2012 - 10:13 AM

Helicopters are over rated and over used, in the overwhelming majority of patients they offer little benefit and disproportionately increase risk

#9 Arctickat

Arctickat
  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 1,727 posts
362
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kelvington, Sask
  • Interests:SCUBA, Flying
  • Occupation:Paramedork

Posted 28 May 2012 - 06:36 PM

Hmmm, okay...The HEMS base is 106nm away from my hospital, The helo flies at an airspeed of 120kts and anyone involved in flight knows that a headwind slows you down more than a tailwind speeds you up, but, for the sake of this, we'll say there is no wind...at all. 212nm round trip, 1hr, 45 min flight time. Patient care and preparation for flight, 45 minutes, (minimum) Overall transport time, 2.5 hours if the patient is lucky.

Ground transport...2 hours.

Can someone tell me how this is an improvement?

Let's add this to the mix....The helo currently, and for the next several months...even years,...has to land at the airport rather than a landing pad at the tertiary facility. This adds another 15 minutes to the trip for ground transport from the airport to the hospital.

#10 Arctickat

Arctickat
  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 1,727 posts
362
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kelvington, Sask
  • Interests:SCUBA, Flying
  • Occupation:Paramedork

Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:44 PM

Another thing that frosts my coconut is that Flight medics and ground medics are both the same level of training, yet the flight medics have a greater scope of practice. These flight medics have the patient for a shorter duration, the ground medics often transport patients that are just as critical for longer transport times. Why can't they have the same scope as their aviating counterparts with identical training and education?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users