Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Did you know it is free to become a member?  Just click "Create Account" on the top right of this page.


Photo

Oral Glucose without taking a BGL


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 musicislife

musicislife
  • Members
  • 46 posts
4
  • Occupation:EMS Student



Posted 22 May 2012 - 09:58 PM

For some reason, they taught me in my first responder class to administer oral glucose but didn't teach us about taking a blood glucose level. That being said, when should I administer it without a confirmed level? Are there any key signs to hypoglycemia?

ignore this, my question has been answered

#2 Chief1C

Chief1C

    Look, my ass glows!

  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 3,548 posts
329
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk Jct.
  • Occupation:Offically a Burned Out EMS Provider

Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:44 AM

I can tell you, as a diabetic myself, that oral glucose doesn't contain enough of a powerful punch to do much harm...whether they need it or not. If they're profoundly hypoglycemic, oral glucose isn't going to be enough to do the trick. If they're hyperglycemic, it won't kill them.

#3 DwayneEMTP

DwayneEMTP

    Welcome to the jungle..we've got fun and games...

  • Moderators
  • 4,465 posts
835
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado
  • Occupation:AAS EMS-Paramedic, remote duty paramedic

Posted 23 May 2012 - 11:44 AM

...ignore this, my question has been answered


Hey, can I ask how your question was answered?

Not a trick question, or trying to set you up for anything, I swear. I'm just curious if someone answered in PM, and if so, why they cheated the rest of the group out of the answer?

Curiosity only.

Good to have you here my friend..

Dwayne

#4 craig

craig
  • Members
  • 391 posts
45
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kandos, New South Wales, Australia
  • Interests:The Outdoors, Sports, Rubgby League, Cricket & My Family
  • Occupation:Intensive Care Paramedic / Technical Rescue Officer

Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:35 PM

probably read his protocol book Dwayne...................

#5 Captain ToHellWithItAll

Captain ToHellWithItAll

    Chief in charge of my making my family happy Officer

  • Chat Room Moderator
  • 7,252 posts
249
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere over the rainbow
  • Occupation:Paramedic/Emergency Department IT consultant

Posted 23 May 2012 - 01:56 PM

I as a diabetic as well, agree that instaglucose won't do much to cause harm.

AS a matter of fact, over all this hullaballoo this past couple of days I had a round of a low sugar. Now my lows are in the 70s and the only thiing I had on hand was a tube of instaglucose. I was in my car.

I was feeling funny, not like before with a low, so I pulled over, yanked out my kit that has all my diabetic testing stuff, insulin and all that and I tested my sugar. it was 73. I opened the tube of instaglucose and emptied it. Damn that stuff tasted nasty.

I waited 10 minutes before calling 911 which I didn't have to. My sugar jumped to 185 and I was able to drive 5 miles to the next exit and get to the mcdonalds and have lunch which is why I was low because I didn't get a chance to have lunch yet.

This was my first experience with having a low that affected me like this.

So I don't think that giving instaglucose without a blood sugar reading will really do much damage at all. I think that if they are profoundly hypoglycemic that they would not be eligible for that anyway, they should be unconscious.

And before anyone jumps on me, Had I have felt worse than I did, I would have called 911 before I took the instaglucose.

#6 paramedicmike

paramedicmike
  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 2,916 posts
290
  • Gender:Male
  • Occupation:PA-C, Paramedic

Posted 23 May 2012 - 02:19 PM

I believe someone mentioned he got his answer while in chat.

#7 Arctickat

Arctickat
  • EMT City Sponsor
  • 1,727 posts
364
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kelvington, Sask
  • Interests:SCUBA, Flying
  • Occupation:Paramedork

Posted 23 May 2012 - 05:17 PM

I believe someone mentioned he got his answer while in chat.


Which is why I wonder why he even bothered to complete the post and start this thread in the first place. It wasn't edited after the fact to let us know he got his answer which means he posted this thread after he'd already gotten his answer in the first place.

Just like it shows below.

Edited by Arctickat, 23 May 2012 - 05:20 PM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users